Discuss: The ethical problems and issues faced by archaeology in terms of questions like "who owns the past?"

These ethical concerns fall into three broad areas. First, there is the capitulum of how to action human remains. Over the past few years, archaeologists pouffeulate often come into conflict with indigenous peoples over the chains and handling of excavated human remains. In Belgium and France, where the first-world-war battlefields are dangerous places hitherto today, with unexploded shells, making excavation a potentially lethal activity, the situation is particularly complex because the allied armies included soldiers from a variety of faiths and ethnicities, including Africans, Indians, Australians and Native Americans, all of whose traditions may prefer to dish out remains differently. Next is the question of ownership of artifacts. In the curtain raising of first-world-war sites, local people armed with metal detectors routinely pull in medals and other memorabilia. The sale of such(prenominal) items has provided an important acknowledgment of income ever since refugees first returned to the area after the conflict. Archaeologists, though, regard such activities as looting. Around the world, the general question of who has the first maintain on buried items local people, the descendants of the original owners or archaeologists is deep controversial.

A third ethical problem concerns the preservation of sites. Should battlefields be left alone as memorials, redeveloped for tourism, or keep for the archaeologists of the future(a)? Archaeologists increasingly consider the third option as in recent years, they have become more selective or so what and where they dig, so th at they do not preclude investigations by ! concomitant generations. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay