Computer Professional Ethics Journal #2 & #3 Essay

Computer Professional Ethics Journal 2 & 3 - Essay ExampleWith such inevitability, there is a need to make precautionary measures to counter forces that are bound to steal their intellectual rights. In the fall in States, there has been a growing problem in appellate courts particularly in patentability of computer programs where they acquit been struggling with the subject matter requirement for patentability. The courts have been having trouble deciding whether various types of software can be accurately characterized as falling under any of the areas of patentable subject matter such as processes or machines. During the early 70s, this has been the problem in the case of Gottschalk v. Benson, where the Court framed the issue as The question is whether the method described and claimed is a process deep down the meaning of the Patent Act. As the years progressed, problems in patentability became more critical and complex. From the definition of process, issues in patentability al so delved into software originality, novelty, piracy, protection, and even at organization value stealing (by pirating or recruiting the computer scientists from another company). And because of this, computer scientists must be well aware of these facts so that they could create counter measures such as security programs, password protections, and other suitable alternative